Skip to content

Connecticut CannaTimesFacts first. You decide.

Send a Tip Search

Sections

The Legislature
Bills, amendments, hearings and votes at the General Assembly, and how cannabis law actually gets written.
Regulators
The Department of Consumer Protection, the Governor's office, the Ombudsman and the other agencies that run the program.
Enforcement
Raids, fines, seizures, the enforcement account, and who pays for policing cannabis.
Courts
Lawsuits, rulings and criminal cases in state and federal court.
Social Equity
The Social Equity Council, licensing rules, ownership and who the equity program actually serves.
Money & Influence
Campaign money, lobbying, political relationships, federal probes and conflicts of interest.
Patients & Testing
Medical patients, caregivers, home grow, laboratory results and product safety.
Hemp
Hemp farmers, hemp-derived cannabinoids, the definitions that decide what is legal to sell, and the federal hemp fight.
Kratom & Psychedelics
The kratom ban, 7-OH, psilocybin decriminalization and psychedelic-assisted therapy.
Take Action
Calls to action, email templates, petitions and model bills from the community.
The Editor's Desk
Statements from the publication, requests for sources, and notes to readers.

Investigations and Records

Investigations
Standing subjects: every story, record and development in one place.
Enforcement Statute Guide
What Connecticut's cannabis statutes say, the penalty each carries, and the lower-tier options in the law.
Documents
407 public records: FOIA productions, court filings, agency correspondence, testing records.
Archive
Search

The publication

Front Page › Documents › Smith v. Lamont (D. Conn. No. 3:25-cv-01728): Court Filings

Court filingU.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut

Smith v. Lamont: Twisted Growers LLC motion to intervene as plaintiff (Doc. 47, Oct. 13, 2026)

Motion by Twisted Growers LLC, a Lakeville, Massachusetts marijuana grower, for leave to intervene as a plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) and 24(b)(1)(B), saying it seeks to enter Connecticut's market as a micro-cultivator and is disadvantaged by the challenged provisions. Eleven pages. Docket entry 47. Public court record obtained from the federal docket; published as filed.

Open Document Download PDF (265 KB)

– / –

Loading document…

Viewer runs in your browser. If it does not load, use Open Document or Download.

Case: Smith v. Lamont et al., No. 3:25-cv-01728 (VDO), U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut. DCP’s own copies of the original complaint and related internal emails are in the DCP Pequot compact production.